X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4A4765F2.70206@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 08:45:38 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090605 Thunderbird/2.0.0.22 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [RFC] jpeg library References: <4A466538 DOT 8030007 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4A46FAA4 DOT 2 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <4A470ADF DOT 5010306 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4A471802 DOT 5030001 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <4A475435 DOT 1060505 AT gmail DOT com> In-Reply-To: <4A475435.1060505@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Dave Korn wrote: > I was just about to say "We could always try and find a security > vulnerability, that's the only thing that would cause upstream to update > libjpeg these days! :) But then I took a look at the new change.log and it's > actually crammed with new and improved functionality, so this is an ideal > opportunity. > > I think the makes freezing (obsoleting) libjpeg-6b forever with the lossless > patch incorporated, and just moving to a straight unpatched release of > libjpeg-7 a no-brainer doesn't it? What a fortuitous bit of timing! Yep. Sometimes you get lucky. Not often -- that's why it's called luck. -- Chuck -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple