X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,J_CHICKENPOX_83,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <9A8D583A539F4BBCB2B2055172F6445A@trcintl.com> From: "Lists" To: References: <200906191739 DOT n5JHcoBi001404 AT spam DOT trcww DOT com> <4A3BEE25 DOT 9010508 AT cygwin DOT com> <1C88F13C5CE84452AE2F41F23365AB73 AT trcintl DOT com> <20090622115136 DOT GQ5039 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Subject: Re: Possible Bug or limitation in Cygwin 1.7 and Rsync and file number limit Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:42:42 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TRC-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-TRC-MailScanner-ID: n5R4ZIV2025421 X-TRC-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-TRC-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=1.078, required 5.75, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_50 1.00, STOX_REPLY_TYPE 0.00, TW_YG 0.08) X-TRC-MailScanner-SpamScore: x X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > On Jun 19 15:55, Lists wrote: >> >>> Can you upgrade to the latest Cygwin 1.7 package and try again. From >>> your >>> cygcheck output, it looks like things are not correct but this may be >>> just >>> a problem with an old cygcheck that doesn't know how to find the >>> implicit >>> mounts. If the issue is still the same, resending the output of the new >>> cygcheck would be helpful. >> >> I just downloaded the newest version of cygwin 1.7 as of 6-19-09 at >> approximately 3:30 CST and had the exact same results. Please find the >> new cygcheck.out file attached. You mentioned above that their might be >> a problem with the mounts. Not sure if it helps to know this, but I can >> successfully use rsync to copy many gigabytes of files. It just hangs >> when there are thousands of files in a single directory (9,000 seems to >> always do it.). Also note that this cygcheck was done on a different >> computer than the first just to make sure this isn't computer specific. >> Again, I have tried it on several. > > Works fine for me under the latest Cygwin 1.7.0-50 using your perl > script and your rsync options. I tend to agree to Larry's assumption > that some 3PP is interferring. > > > Corinna > Sorry to just now be replying but I have been out of the country. I tried the same procedure on yet another computer. I actually got it to run one time without a problem. I then deleted the copied files and repeated the procedure and got the same problem again. I am totally convienced there is a problem here. One of the machines I have been working on is a "clean" machine, meaning that it has no other software on it other than the OS and this software. I keep a machine around like this for just such purposes. After using it for a while, I reload it. By the way, some of the machines I have tried are not even on the same network. So, I have tried this on at least 10 machines now and all exhibit the same behavior. I could attach another output from but they all look pretty much like the previous ones I attached. Can anyone else try this and confirm the problem? If it works, I suspect if you try it again a time or two, you too will see the problem. Before trying it again, you need to make sure and delete the files from the destination directory. Thank you. - Kyle -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple