X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:17:51 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin 1.7 Installation on Server 2008 with Terminal Services Message-ID: <20090623161751.GA5495@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <297343D29C14AA4D822142893ABEAEF3067B857F AT srv1163ex1 DOT flightsafety DOT com> <20090622153241 DOT GZ5039 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <297343D29C14AA4D822142893ABEAEF3067B8656 AT srv1163ex1 DOT flightsafety DOT com> <20090623090152 DOT GF5039 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <297343D29C14AA4D822142893ABEAEF3067B876F AT srv1163ex1 DOT flightsafety DOT com> <20090623155317 DOT GB4773 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-02-20) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Jun 23 16:07, Eric Blake wrote: > Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes: > > > Bash isn't the only affected binary so it's still worth the FAQ entry. > > But, never mind, I just created one. > > The FAQ should mention the 'rebase' package, not the 'rebaseall' package. Thanks, done. > And not to sound anxious, but are we going to have a new binutils and gcc > release prior to cygwin 1.7 going golden? I'm hoping the same. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple