X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4A3FD2B8.6010104@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:51:36 +0100 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: HEADSUP maintainers: Packages install scripts without execute permissions References: <4A3D1570 DOT 5020506 AT aim DOT com> <20090622094310 DOT GN5039 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20090622131144 DOT GR5039 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4A3F8955 DOT 3080407 AT gmail DOT com> <20090622134020 DOT GS5039 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Eric Blake wrote: > Indeed - changing things to be 'bash script' instead of the current 'bash -c > script' would make the use of alternative interpreters harder. But it does not > make it impossible; you can always do: > > #!/bin/sh > /bin/awk <<\EOF > ... > EOF > > instead of > > #!/bin/awk Yes, but that does seem a bit awkward. cheers, DaveK -- *rimshot* -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple