X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_83,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4A3C0794.7060808@cygwin.com> Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:48:04 -0400 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Possible Bug or limitation in Cygwin 1.7 and Rsync and file number limit References: <200906191739 DOT n5JHcoBi001404 AT spam DOT trcww DOT com> <4A3BEE25 DOT 9010508 AT cygwin DOT com> <1C88F13C5CE84452AE2F41F23365AB73 AT trcintl DOT com> In-Reply-To: <1C88F13C5CE84452AE2F41F23365AB73@trcintl.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Lists wrote: > Larry Hall wrote: >> >> Can you upgrade to the latest Cygwin 1.7 package and try again. From >> your >> cygcheck output, it looks like things are not correct but this may be >> just >> a problem with an old cygcheck that doesn't know how to find the implicit >> mounts. If the issue is still the same, resending the output of the new >> cygcheck would be helpful. > > I just downloaded the newest version of cygwin 1.7 as of 6-19-09 at > approximately 3:30 CST and had the exact same results. Please find the > new cygcheck.out file attached. You mentioned above that their might be > a problem with the mounts. Not sure if it helps to know this, but I can > successfully use rsync to copy many gigabytes of files. It just hangs > when there are thousands of files in a single directory (9,000 seems to > always do it.). Also note that this cygcheck was done on a different > computer than the first just to make sure this isn't computer specific. > Again, I have tried it on several. > > Thank you in advance. Your cygcheck output looks more like what I would expect except that it is truncated. Does this happen when you run it or did it just get stopped early? -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/