X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:31:15 +0200 From: "Vincent R." To: Andy Koppe Cc: Subject: Re: Optimize cygwin on recent windows version (Vista and Seven) In-Reply-To: <416096c60906151139n45e0d967n8abee104fe194867@mail.gmail.com> References: <7c6dcbb9c797277cc8ffb1fc985844af AT mail DOT smartmobili DOT com> <416096c60906151139n45e0d967n8abee104fe194867 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> Message-ID: <4af3381770954501a1047738cf928219@mail.smartmobili.com> X-Sender: forumer AT smartmobili DOT com User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:39:39 +0100, Andy Koppe wrote: >> Until now I was using cygwin on Windows XP and I was satisfied by >> cygwin-1.7 but these last few days >> I switched to a more powerful laptop with very fast hardware (Core Duo >> 3.0 >> Ghz and SSD OCZ Vertex) >> and running windows Seven. >> Now when I test cygwin, everything is so sloooooowww > > Not exactly a helpful problem report. In what sort of scenarios do you > find it to be slow? Is it actually slower than your old system? Easy just try to rebuild a true software( for instance gcc) and you will have one year more between the moment you start the build and the moment it's over. I am not kidding, if you just "play" with cygwin of course you cannot notice the problem. If you like I could make some benchmark... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/