X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:44:07 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 1.7.0 sem_open Message-ID: <20090612104407.GA13415@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <94b5b62d0906112150g473b49fao41f95c3a1c6e6014 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20090612084932 DOT GC5039 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4A322438 DOT 9050002 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <20090612101654 DOT GA11934 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20090612101958 DOT GB11934 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4A323315 DOT 9090902 AT gmail DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A323315.9090902@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-02-20) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Jun 12 11:51, Dave Korn wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Jun 12 12:16, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >> On Jun 12 04:47, Yaakov S wrote: > >>> On 12/06/2009 03:49, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >>>> Even if linking against librt.a would be necessary on Cygwin > >>> But a stub librt.a would be helpful nonetheless. It looks like most of > >>> the relevant symbols are in posix_ipc.cc, timer.cc, and times.cc, but > >>> there are other symbols defined in the latter two that may not belong in > >>> librt. > >> Certainly a good idea. I don't know if it would hurt if too many > >> symbols could be linked against via librt.a. We could move the > >> realtime functions from timer.cc and times.cc into its own source > >> file. Or we could create it with only the symbols from posix_ipc.cc, > >> just so it is available for linking. > > > > For now I did the latter. Adding more symbols to it shouldn't be much > > of a problem, if required. > > Shouldn't this reuse the speclib mechanism? It does. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/