X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4A2D541F.4090509@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 19:10:39 +0100 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [1.7] Cannot read /proc/stat References: <4A2D3C62 DOT 40408 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <20090608171454 DOT GA25642 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Andrew Schulman wrote: >> (*) Is anybody here actually still using NT4? > > Anyone still running NT4 has a security disaster on their hands. Not that > that's a reason to cut them off of Cygwin... in fact they probably could > use the help... but Microsoft EOL'd NT4 years ago, and at some point it > seems that Cygwin should do the same. NT4 is still widely used in corporate environments where it just lives in a private intranet and isn't exposed (hopefully!) to the outside world. I think we shouldn't rush to ditch support for it as long as it doesn't start to become a significant burden in terms of missing support for newer APIs. cheers, DaveK -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/