X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Andrew DeFaria Subject: Re: How to run GNU Emacs from Windows icon Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 20:03:11 -0700 Lines: 41 Message-ID: References: <746652D230364290B3E68BE37FA6CB50 AT corp DOT real DOT com> <11A75AD176AD4FDDB6913E94D92DCB64 AT corp DOT real DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090409) In-Reply-To: <11A75AD176AD4FDDB6913E94D92DCB64@corp.real.com> X-Stationery: 0.4.8.14 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com David Karr wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com [mailto:cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com] On Behalf >> Of Andrew DeFaria >> Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 8:47 AM >> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com >> Subject: Re: How to run GNU Emacs from Windows icon >> >> David Karr wrote: >>> I now need to set up Windows desktop icons that can start these >>> processes. I managed to get XEmacs working, with the following >>> command line: >>> >>> C:\cygwin\bin\bash.exe --login -c C:/cygwin/bin/xemacs-21.4.22.exe >> Why the insistence on running bash? Why not simply run Xemacs? That's >> what I do at work and it works fine for me. > It may not produce any difficult symptoms with XEmacs itself, but > without that I don't get a normal login shell out of the box. And why do you require a "normal login shell"? Here's what I have for my shortcut that starts up XEmacs: "C:\Cygwin\bin\run.exe xemacs". Nothing else is required. I don't need to "login". I'm logged in already. I just need to edit files... >> Again, why run bash first then run emacs? > Again, so I get a login shell. In any case, this has no effect on the > symptom. I tried doing this without bash, and it fails in exactly the > same way. You have not defined what exactly your "symptom" is WRT xemacs. You stated: "I managed to get XEmacs working, with the following command line: C:\cygwin\bin\bash.exe --login -c C:/cygwin/bin/xemacs-21.4.22.exe " Then went on to describe how it fails with emacs (not xemacs) because emacs and a problem with your terminal type. I would think that xemacs doesn't care as much about terminal type. Is xemacs failing with the same error about terminal type? What is TERM set to for you? (Me: it's set to cygwin). -- Andrew DeFaria Computers make very fast, very accurate mistakes. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/