X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4A084979.8070502@cornell.edu> Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 11:51:21 -0400 From: Ken Brown User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Packaging bug (?): icu-3.8-5 / cygport problem References: <6910a60905110221h26ca30e4tdf4c2f8e0cf2e984 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> In-Reply-To: <6910a60905110221h26ca30e4tdf4c2f8e0cf2e984@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 5/11/2009 5:21 AM, Reini Urban wrote: > We have a cygport problem here, for testing see the icu-3.8-5 package > for release-2. Reini, Thanks for looking into this. While we're waiting for the cygport problem to be resolved, could you just clarify one thing for me? It looks like the cygport problem caused icu-3.8-5.src.patch to duplicate many of the patches that came from gentoo. This leaves three cygwin-specific patches. I understand two of them, but I'm puzzled by the patch to pwin32.h: +#ifdef __CYGWIN__ +#define U_HAVE_INTTYPES_H 1 +#endif Why is this needed? Doesn't the configuration process discover that cygwin has inttypes.h? Or am I misunderstanding something? Thanks. Ken -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/