X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4A000978.6050300@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 10:40:08 +0100
From: Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT googlemail DOT com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty
References: <49FFDC94 DOT 7010206 AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>
In-Reply-To: <49FFDC94.7010206@bonhard.uklinux.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Fergus wrote:
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
>> For the future: there's no need to bzip the attachment.
>> That makes it harder to read.
> 
> I just attached cygcheck.srv.out to the immediately preceding post and

  No you didn't!

> [additionally] it has appeared en clair in the text.

  No it hasn't![*]

> Apologies! Last
> time I did this I got a raft of annoyed responses for clogging people's
> inboxes. What am I doing wrong in creating the attachment?

  Thunderbird does not automatically bzip attachments, and even if it did, it
wouldn't have removed the ".srv" from the filename.  It does, however, have an
option under "View->Display Attachements Inline" that displays plain-text
attachments "en clair".

  What you are doing wrong is looking at your later post:

Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 07:22:34 +0100
Message-ID: <49FFDB2A DOT 2060103 AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-05/msg00133.html

rather than the one CGF's reply:

Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 01:04:22 -0400
Message-ID: <20090504050422 DOT GA4733 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
In-Reply-To: <49FE746E DOT 2080409 AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-05/msg00075.html

was actually addressing:

Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 05:51:58 +0100
Message-ID: <49FE746E DOT 2080409 AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-05/msg00074.html

which, seeing as it happened later in time, CGF's post could not reasonably
have been expected to be responding to!

 PROTIP:  "View->Sort by->Threaded" will help avoid this problem in future!

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
[*]  - An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a
proposition!  You're just contradicting everything I say![**]
[**] - No I'm not!

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/