X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <23295820.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:01:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Casull To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: GCC 4.4.0 - Can't activate threading support In-Reply-To: <49F82327.4090400@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <23292063 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <49F817C2 DOT 2000908 AT gmail DOT com> <23293465 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <49F81E85 DOT 3080802 AT gmail DOT com> <49F82327 DOT 4090400 AT gmail DOT com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com What can be done to add the pthread_mutex_timedlock function to the pthread implementation of cygwin ? And what does the PTC achronyme mean ? :) Dave Korn-6 wrote: > > Dave Korn wrote: >> Casull wrote: >>> The GCC 4.4 implementation of std::thread is guarded by the >>> following preprocessing directive: >>> >>> #if defined(_GLIBCXX_HAS_GTHREADS) && >>> defined(_GLIBCXX_USE_C99_STDINT_TR1) >>> >>> When looking at the bits/c++config.h, _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_STDINT_TR1 is >>> defined >>> but _GLIBCXX_HAS_GTHREADS isn't. >> >> Ah. There is an autoconf test in libstdc++-v3 that defines that, and >> the >> comment says: >> >>> dnl Check if gthread implementation defines the types and functions >>> dnl required by the c++0x thread library. Conforming gthread >>> dnl implementations can define __GTHREADS_CXX0X to enable use with >>> c++0x. > > It fails because : > > // In case of POSIX threads check _POSIX_TIMEOUTS too. > #if (defined(_PTHREADS) && (!defined(_POSIX_TIMEOUTS) || _POSIX_TIMEOUTS > <= 0)) > #error > #endif > > > ... we don't have any definition of _POSIX_TIMEOUTS. That's a feature > test > macro the exact definition of which I haven't found yet, but from > libstdc's > point of view, it appears to mean that the pthread_mutex_timedlock > function is > supported. Which indeed Cygwin doesn't currently implement. > > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/pthread_mutex_timedlock.html > > Looks like it wouldn't be too hard to add, PTC I suppose. > > cheers, > DaveK > > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/GCC-4.4.0---Can%27t-activate-threading-support-tp23292063p23295820.html Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/