X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <49F5EC18.6090109@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:32:08 +0100 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Speclib problems References: <49F5E7F4 DOT 6080909 AT cornell DOT edu> In-Reply-To: <49F5E7F4.6080909@cornell.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Ken Brown wrote: > I don't know anything about import libraries, but I wonder if these > errors are caused by the speclib problems that have been discussed in > recent weeks. Nope, no relation whatsoever. The speclib stuff relates only to the system libraries libc, libm, libdl, libutil, libcygwin, libpthread. I think your zlib problem comes from somehow getting both a statically-linked in-tree build of zlib and the system's zlib dll import library into the final link at the same time. The undefined references in the other libs I can't guess where they come from, you'll have to track them down - maybe the libs aren't in dependency-order on the linker commandline. cheers, DaveK -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/