X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <49C1CFE7.1030401@sbcglobal.net> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:53:59 -0700 From: Tim Prince Reply-To: tprince AT computer DOT org User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20081227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: gcc4: cc References: <49C0467A DOT 1080404 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <49C07906 DOT 2060504 AT gmail DOT com> <49C1CA1E DOT 20509 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> In-Reply-To: <49C1CA1E.20509@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > > While you're at it, if you have a chance, I think a f95 would be helpful > as well. > but some of us may prefer to leave it to the operator to create an alias or symlink, which otherwise will increase the number of conflicts which arise when we use cygwin as a development environment with other compilers. I got used to there being no cc in cygwin before I found out that most linux installations alias it to gcc. Before that, cc usually meant a compiler which was vastly inferior to gcc, and certainly not interchangeable. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/