X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Andrew Schulman Subject: Re: SSH/SCREEN/REATTACH bug Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:15:46 -0500 Lines: 20 Message-ID: <1bqqp4tt20e3e16f8vd6j11t1u7bpjmikc@4ax.com> References: <20090217151359 DOT 151520 AT gmx DOT net> <20090218091416 DOT 102490 AT gmx DOT net> <20090219105110 DOT GG29052 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archive: encrypt X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Andrew, can you give us a bit more detail than just this micro snippet > of information? > > What about providing details about the failing test done in screen's > configure... > > What about extracting the code from configure and test it standalone... > > What about maybe using strace and/or GDB on it to find out a bit more... > > What about providing the standalone test to us eventually with > instructions how to reproduce the problem and maybe some of the > information you got by using strace/GDB... > > ...instead of just leaving everything except of the bare information "it > doesn't work" to the Cygwin developers? As much as we like to get rid > of bugs in Cygwin, we have a life beyond Cygwin, too. Corinna, I sent exactly this report yesterday afternoon, but it seems not to have gone through. Will repost ASAP. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/