X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,J_CHICKENPOX_64,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <498DF01D.5040905@veritech.com> Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 15:33:33 -0500 From: "Lee D. Rothstein" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [OT] Vista feedback References: <4194a74fe2e6f91c44e93a34d6fb8550 AT mail DOT smartmobili DOT com> <498C56F3 DOT 4030201 AT sbcglobal DOT net> In-Reply-To: <498C56F3.4030201@sbcglobal.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000018, version=1.0.1 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Tim Prince wrote: > Vincent R. wrote: > >> Ok finally I got my answers, I am cross-compiling and everything is so >> SLOWWWWWWWW >> that I will have to install Windows XP ... >> Is it because of the couple laptop(Dell XPS M1530)/Vista or does it come >> from Vista itself ? > You didn't say whether you have sufficient RAM, why you would not consider > 64-bit or SSD if you are serious about Vista. Not that we want your > answer. cygwin is agonizingly slow for many jobs, even on XP SP3. You'll > see the reasons in the archives of this group. Cygwin on Vista 64b with sufficient memory (6GB) can be scads faster than with any prior version of windoze, and most especially faster than Vista 32b! -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/