X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: gv became really slow? References: From: "Dr. Volker Zell" In-Reply-To: (Dan Tsafrir's message of "Thu, 5 Feb 2009 00:35:53 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) XEmacs/21.4.22 (cygwin32) Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 10:26:16 +0100 Message-ID: <7zbpthutdz.fsf@vzell-de.de.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com >>>>> Dan Tsafrir writes: > Hi, > It used to be the case that opening a postscript file with gv on > cygwin was more or less immediate. I've recently updated cygwin and > now it takes about 2-5 seconds (a clock is displayed while gv is > "thinking"). This happens even if the postscript file contains only a > few words. For example, if you do: > % echo hello > hello.txt > % a2ps hello.txt -o hello.ps > % gv hello.ps > The gv version I have running is 3.6.5 (cygwin 1.5.25 on XP). I have > no way of telling whether this is a cygwin problem or something else. > But running the above example on a debian machine with a gv-3.6.5 > installed results in an immediate, much snappier, response. > Is this just my problem? And if not, can something be done? I cannot confirm this behaviour. . > Thanks, > --Dan Ciao Volker -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/