X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 10:13:49 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: access() function in 1.7 Message-ID: <20090124091349.GB17576@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <497AC602 DOT 6050709 AT gmail DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <497AC602.6050709@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Jan 24 18:40, David Billinghurst wrote: > I am having a problem with the access() function in cygwin-1.7. > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38956 >[...] > Under cygwin-1.5 > $ ./test_access > access = -1 > > Under cygwin-1.7 > $ ./test_access.exe > access = -1 I assume you mean "access = 0" under 1.7. If that's what you see, the test probably works as designed. You're running the test under an administrative account. Admin accounts have always the right to write, same as under Linux. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/