X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:42:02 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: WG: Re: SSH V.5.1 with Cygwin1.dll 1.7.0(0.189/5/3) 2008-12-09: Very ?large logon times... Message-ID: <20090122114202.GD17948@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Jan 22 09:44, Markus.Bauer wrote: > Hello Corinna, I already told your collegue Carsten: Please, don't http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU I hope you're aware that cygwin AT cygwin DOT com is a public mailing list? I'm just asking because you're addressing me personally... > my name is Markus Bauer. I'm a colleague from Carsten Porzler and I tried > to figure out where the time is wasted. > I put some debugging statements in sec_auth.cc and syscalls.cc. The > strange is, that I only see the statements from syscalls.cc but not the > many I put in sec_auth.cc. > > Maybe you have an idea? No. Not really. The only reason could be that the code isn't called. Only further debugging will help. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/