X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:07:26 +0100 From: Samuel Thibault To: Sjors Gielen Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Hosting the Debian/kCygwin port? Message-ID: <20090121130726.GL5034@const.bordeaux.inria.fr> Mail-Followup-To: Sjors Gielen , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <49751189 DOT 5050609 AT dazjorz DOT com> <20090121094825 DOT GF15594 AT foghorn DOT stateful DOT de> <20090121101424 DOT GA5034 AT const DOT bordeaux DOT inria DOT fr> <20090121101813 DOT GH15594 AT foghorn DOT stateful DOT de> <49771507 DOT 6090002 AT dazjorz DOT com> <20090121123837 DOT GK5034 AT const DOT bordeaux DOT inria DOT fr> <49771BD8 DOT 602 AT dazjorz DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49771BD8.602@dazjorz.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com BTW, AIUI from a cygwin point of view, in principle there shouldn't be any need to patch debian sources: if cygwin behaves differently from linux, then it's a bug in cygwin. One exception is of course the configure target which contains cygwin instead of linux. Appart from that, every fix should ideally be in cygwin. Now you're of course free to patch things in the debian package so as to make quick progress, but on the long term there shouldn't be any patch except in configure scripts. Samuel -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/