X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:24:36 -0500 From: "Mark J. Reed" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: rm seems to fail In-Reply-To: <5520d94f0901130916l7669d8capa39587365237da4f@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <5520d94f0901130852l310a9dfdk9821c26458d8d5e AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <5520d94f0901130901y66a7df50yca7e586998a3bea3 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <5520d94f0901130916l7669d8capa39587365237da4f AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:16 PM, greenup wrote: > oh, I forgot to mention: right after doing the rm, the return code is > success, even though it failed to actually remove the file. rm with -f is silent about certain types of errors, usually of the "file doesn't exist" variety. So that sounds like rm thinks that either it successfully deleted the file or it didn't exist in the first place. Is rm without -f able to remove goo/foo (after you confirm at the prompt)? If not, does it generate an error indication? -- Mark J. Reed -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/