X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.7 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <5195c8760901051704w4a68c10ehcde6cd5610fa9f3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 06:34:04 +0530
From: "Jeenu V" <jeenuv AT gmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: cmd.exe from Cygwin
In-Reply-To: <4962856F.4090206@equate.dyndns.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <5195c8760901020359y51dbe19cw2803e36afe028c1d AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> 	 <dd5f2deb0901020623o26f5dc9crf9eec2b084f2f4db AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> 	 <5195c8760901020642g7af8c830w237ee298e645b91f AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> 	 <gjohi3$fbt$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> 	 <5195c8760901050130q23bd9f2fxbc57f7e73db441aa AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> 	 <4962340F DOT 6000004 AT cygwin DOT com> 	 <5195c8760901051014h201d425cp927f31c1cb941233 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> 	 <4962569C DOT 9070607 AT cygwin DOT com> <4962856F DOT 4090206 AT equate DOT dyndns DOT org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

> Maybe the best thing to do would be to edit the .bat/.cmd file so that the
> first thing it does is redefines PATH as it is in a normal cmd window - ie
> w/o cygwin running.
> That would result in the environment being clean for cygwin normally, and
> mean your symbian stuff wouldn't end up crapping itself by calling cygwin
> tools that work differently..

Yup, this is what I had in mind. Thanks.

> I did not have a chance to, no.  Is there something there that you believe
> significantly changes the context of your original question?

Well, I initially thought these two problems were related. But now
that one appear to be solved, and and other remains, I think it's
worth taking a look. I'll also check with other Cygwin users around me
if they face the same problem. Or is it best that I start another
thread altogether?

-- 
:J

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/