X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET,RCVD_IN_JMF_BL,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 13:40:51 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: POP Rmail in Emacs In-reply-to: <494C1451.5050703@alice.it> X-012-Sender: halo1 AT inter DOT net DOT il To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-id: References: <494C1451 DOT 5050703 AT alice DOT it> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:38:25 +0100 > From: Angelo Graziosi > > Ken Brown wrote: > > > And I think Angelo has built CVS versions of emacs 23 with it > > Yes, I confirm. I build Emacs-23 weekly. > > In the last year many things have changed, and in better. > > Now it bootstraps in less than 20 minutes (before, more than an hour). > Also, some strange bootstrap failure (which were solved simply changing > directory) has disappeared. > > The build with GCC 4 series (before with my own build of gcc 4, now with > cygwin gcc4) is very stable. What is the status of building with GCC 3.x? Does it still crash? Anyway, like I said: feel free to submit (to emacs-devel AT gnu DOT org) a patch for etc/PROBLEMS that expresses the known problems with Cygwin in a more up-to-date fashion. > ...and, last but not least, yes we need a Cygwin Emacs maintainer: I > would just curious to know why I have to start my GTK build of Emacs23 > with the annoying G_SLICE... > > $ G_SLICE=always-malloc emacs & This should also be in PROBLEMS, IMO. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/