X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com Resent-Message-ID: <20081210230834 DOT 30307 DOT qmail AT sourceware DOT org> Message-ID: <074401c95b1a$d16fc450$3201a8c0@aew2knew> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com References: <20081210174922 DOT GA2339 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Subject: Re: cygwin and cygwin-xfree lists to merge Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 23:58:27 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Andreas Eibach Resent-From: root AT sourceware DOT org Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 23:08:34 +0000 Resent-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Will Parsons wrote: > You may not consider it a compelling argument, but I find the traffic on > the cygwin list more than enough already, and am glad I don't have to > bother about the cygwin-xfree traffic. I'd prefer to keep things as > is. But on xfree, there IS NO traffic! Just check the archives to get an insight into this: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/ This is ridiculously few compared to 2 years ago when Harold L Hunt put more work into this _per week_ than all people together summed up from summer to end of this year! -Andreas -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/