X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 07:15:39 +0100 (CET)
From: Marco Atzeri <marco_atzeri AT yahoo DOT it>
Subject: cygwin-1.7: linking difference
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <123264.29476.qm@web25004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Hi All,
following the Corinna request I tried to test the 
building of my packages on cygwin-1.7 and I found this
slight difference when linking

on cygwin 1.5 "-lcruft.dll" is accepted as form 
to link versus cygcruft.dll

while on 1.7 the outcome is:

/bin/ld: cannot find -lcruft.dll

of course if I modified the form "in -lcruft"
than everything is fine.

Is it a intentional change ?

Regards
Marco

PS: My packages need c++ and gfortran so I will wait
Dave before uploading on cygwin-1.7 


      

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/