X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 09:38:14 -0500 From: "Gustavo Seabra" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: gcc4/gfortran MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Hi All, I recently made a fresh new Cygwin installation. I asked for the full installation of the "devel" category to be installed, which resulted in both gcc and gcc4 to be installed. (BTW, great work with gcc4 package, thanks a lot!!!) I wonder: 1. Is is safe to remove the old gcc (3.*) packages and replace them by symlinks to the new gcc4 executables? 2. In this case, which executables should I point the symlink to? For instance, if I were to replace g77 by a symlink to gfortran, which of the 4 gfortran executables should I use: $ locate gfortran | grep exe /bin/gfortran-4.exe /bin/i686-pc-cygwin-gfortran-4.exe /usr/bin/gfortran-4.exe /usr/bin/i686-pc-cygwin-gfortran-4.exe 3. Lastly, just a dumb question: why do we get multiple executables in the first place? I noticed that g77 also comes in multiple files: $ locate g77 | grep exe /bin/g77.exe /usr/bin/g77.exe Is that really necessary? Thanks a lot, -- Gustavo Seabra Postdoctoral Associate Quantum Theory Project - University of Florida Gainesville - Florida - USA -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/