X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4919132B.20909@mitel.com> Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:07:55 -0500 From: Lee Dilkie User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: how do I report a bug in cygpath References: <4918A261 DOT 1030205 AT mitel DOT com> <4918A3F2 DOT 5060903 AT cygwin DOT com> <4918C4AF DOT 3020204 AT mitel DOT com> <20081111035352 DOT GA17315 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <491904FB DOT 9010705 AT mitel DOT com> <20081111044537 DOT GA17111 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-Reply-To: <20081111044537.GA17111@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:07:23PM -0500, Lee Dilkie wrote: > >> Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 06:33:03PM -0500, Lee Dilkie wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: >>>> >>>> Thanks for the reply Larry. >>>> >>>> >>>>>> It is reporting an absolute path for >>>>>> windows style in all invocations and ignoring the absence of -a. >>>>>> >>>>>> $ cygpath -w foo >>>>>> C:\foo >>>>>> >>>>>> $ cygpath -wa foo >>>>>> C:\foo >>>>>> >>>>>> $ cygpath -u foo >>>>>> foo >>>>>> >>>>>> $ cygpath -ua foo >>>>>> /cygdrive/c//foo >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> Sorry but this WJFFM in cygwin-1.7.0-31 although the double // in the >>> -ua case is annoying. >>> >>> >> Sorry, but where is the manual or documentation for 1.7.? >> > > 1.7.0 hasn't been released. It's in a "If you have to ask you probably > shouldn't be using it" state. > > cygpath --help > > Will provide you with accurate help. > Thanks, but I guess I was looking for more along the lines of change logs or something. You know, a headsup along the lines of the faw for 1.5. But as you say, it's still in development. > >> Is it intentional that the output of cygpath would change in such a >> non-backwards-compatible way? Showing only absolute paths in windows >> broke my makefile scripts. >> > > Please don't jump to conclusions. No one has said anything about > changing the output of cygpath Sorry, I misunderstood your "WJFFM in cygwin 1.7.0-31" comment. I thought you meant that this output was intentional. So that now leaves us with my my cygwin 1.7 install produces the same output for "cygpath -m foo" and "cygpath -ma foo". I have tried this on two machines, with the same results. $ cygpath foo foo $ cygpath -m foo C:/Documents and Settings/v-leed/foo $ cygpath -ma foo C:/Documents and Settings/v-leed/foo $ And while I'm at it... Dumb question. How do I find out what version of cygwin is installed? You're comment about 1.7.0-31 has me curious. > . > > If you read > > http://cygwin.com/problems.html > > that is one of the subtle points that is trying to be made. > I have read that page in the past, and again just now. I'm not seeing the subtle point... 'course it could be *real* subtle... ;) > Once again: http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#WJFFM > > >>> You asked how to report problems. The answer to your question is at the >>> bottom of every message to the cygwin mailing list: >>> >>> >>>> Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html >>>> > > cgf > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/