X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-Trace: 86537096/mk-filter-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com/B2C/$b2c-THROTTLED-DYNAMIC/b2c-CUSTOMER-DYNAMIC-IP/79.66.94.76/None/johne53 AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk
X-SBRS: None
X-RemoteIP: 79.66.94.76
X-IP-MAIL-FROM: johne53 AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk
X-MUA: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE  V6.00.2900.2180
X-IP-BHB: Once
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEAOi37UhPQl5M/2dsb2JhbACEYro8gWo
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,383,1220223600";     d="scan'208";a="86537096"
Message-ID: <005201c92a1f$27bc62a0$4001a8c0@mycomputer>
From: "John Emmas" <johne53 AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <001901c929f3$030ee7b0$4001a8c0 AT mycomputer> <042101c929fb$1a61d8c0$9601a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <011201c92a05$531a5ed0$4001a8c0 AT mycomputer> <48EDF178 DOT 1020705 AT byu DOT net> <001801c92a08$3a074630$4001a8c0 AT mycomputer> <20081009141037 DOT GE13923 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
Subject: Re: __CYGWIN_USE_BIG_TYPES__
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:56:05 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	format=flowed; 	charset="iso-8859-1"; 	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Christopher Faylor"
Subject: Re: __CYGWIN_USE_BIG_TYPES__
>
> "gcc -dDI -E" is probably your friend to help you track down who is 
> including what.
>
Thanks Christopher.  I'll try that too.

BTW, am I right in thinking that Cygwin's gcc is still at revision 3.4.4? 
My Linux one seems to be 4.1.2.  Maybe that might be another important 
difference?

John 


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/