X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Trace: 83532188/mk-filter-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com/B2C/$b2c-THROTTLED-DYNAMIC/b2c-CUSTOMER-DYNAMIC-IP/79.66.94.76/None/johne53 AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 79.66.94.76 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: johne53 AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArwEANMA5khPQl5M/2dsb2JhbACEDE24O4Fo X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,357,1220223600"; d="scan'208";a="83532188" Message-ID: <004f01c9258d$c3101f80$4001a8c0@mycomputer> From: "John Emmas" To: References: <003f01c9258c$660320e0$4001a8c0 AT mycomputer> <20081003181947 DOT GB4663 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Subject: Re: A dumb question about static libs ? Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 19:25:14 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Faylor" > > No, because it wouldn't work. This has nothing to do with static vs. > dynamic. While the format of a .a file may be similar that doesn't > equate to object file interoperability. Cygwin's nm and ar commands > could theoretically read archives from a number of other operating > systems. That doesn't mean that the objects that are in the archive > could be linked in. > > cgf > Thanks Christopher. That's pretty much what I thought but it was worth asking. John -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/