X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <6910a60808290339k12212730i1ae450dedce7124@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:39:58 +0200 From: "Reini Urban" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Limited regex support in newlib cripples syntax highlighting in nano In-Reply-To: <31c5d6500808010103r1a0c3823p70351cc15fbf1f23@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <31c5d6500808010103r1a0c3823p70351cc15fbf1f23 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 12e3481f56e1f2e3 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com 2008/8/1 Tomi Belan wrote as "Limited regex support in newlib cripples syntax highlighting in nano" > Cygwin regex.h implementation doesn't support some special sequences, > for example \< (beginning of word), \> (end of word) and \b (word > boundary). This causes a usability bug with the nano editor, which > uses these sequences extensively in most of its syntax highlighting > rules. Posix regex is much faster then perl-style pcre regex. Syntax highlighter usually prefer fast over complete. So the term "crippled" should be used with care. See e.g. http://swtch.com/~rsc/regexp/regexp1.html - Regular Expression Matching Can Be Simple And Fast (but is slow in Java, Perl, PHP, Python, Ruby, ...) - which complains about the typical POSIX spencer implementation also. -- Reini Urban http://phpwiki.org/ http://murbreak.at/ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/