X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: Phil Smith To: "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:46:11 -0700 Subject: RE: Probably stupid make question Message-ID: References: <48B706FB DOT 4CAE7693 AT dessent DOT net> In-Reply-To: <48B706FB.4CAE7693@dessent.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=4.65.7161:2.4.4,1.2.40,4.0.164 definitions=2008-08-29_01:2008-08-28,2008-08-29,2008-08-28 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=3.1.0-0805090000 definitions=main-0808280156 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id m7SNlnMC012848 Well, I said it was probably stupid :-) Ok, I'll dig into it some more. It seemed worth asking in case everyone said "Hey, dip****, use the -XYZ option". ...phsiii -----Original Message----- From: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com [mailto:cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com] On Behalf Of Brian Dessent Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 4:14 PM To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Probably stupid make question Phil Smith wrote: > We're perverting CMake and Cygwin make to use a cross-compiler for z/OS (IBM mainframe). We've beaten it mostly into submission, but are hitting an issue with definitions being passed. Cygwin make seems to be passing them in the format: > -Dvarname value > rather than: > -Dvarname=value > and the cross-compiler doesn't like that much. Some discussion with more *IX-savvy friends suggests that the "blank" format is older, and is deprecated due to ambiguity (does "-Dvarname abc.c xyz.c" mean "set varname to abc.c and compile xyz.c", or "set varname to 1 and compile abc.c and xyz.c"?). I think you're going to have to be more specific, such as providing a testcase that reproduces the problem. This must be due to some aspect of cmake, because there's nothing in plain make (AFAIK) that has anything to do with how -D or any other parameter is passed to any tool -- make executes commands exactly as written in the Makefile, no more no less. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/