X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <489A5B27.3080404@cygwin.com> Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 22:17:11 -0400 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.16) Gecko/20080723 Remi/2.0.0.16-1.fc5.remi Lightning/0.8 Thunderbird/2.0.0.16 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: ABI unification References: <1218043716 DOT 30536 DOT ezmlm AT cygwin DOT com> <005501c8f81b$575346e0$9601a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <20080807013523 DOT GA25033 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-Reply-To: <20080807013523.GA25033@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 08:48:18PM -0400, Francis Litterio wrote: >> Dave Korn wrote: >>>> Perhaps this can be "fixed" for any non-x86 Cygwin port? >>> The very concept of a non-x86 Cygwin port is meaningless nonsense. You >>> need to do a bit more homework. I suggest you start by reading the >>> first sentence on the first page at http://cygwin.com/. >> Doesn't Windows Server 2003 run on Intel's Itanium processor? >> Technically, that's a non-x86 Windows platform. > > Would it help if I vowed not to port Cygwin to the Itanium? What?!?! No Itanium port of Cygwin? Now what are we supposed to do, huh? (Sorry for co-opting this thread for my own purposes but as desperate as this ABI issue is, the fact that Cygwin will not be ported to Itanium is, well, catastrophic! Chris must be stopped... or started... or something!!!) -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/