X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Francis Litterio <flitterio AT gmail DOT com>
Subject:  Re: ABI unification
Date:  Wed, 06 Aug 2008 20:48:18 -0400
Lines: 12
Message-ID:  <u7iatprxr.fsf@gmail.com>
References:  <1218043716 DOT 30536 DOT ezmlm AT cygwin DOT com> <COL101-W752A63DF14AA0636D07886E67A0 AT phx DOT gbl> <005501c8f81b$575346e0$9601a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Draft-From: ("nntp+news.gmane.org:gmane.os.cygwin" 99568)
Gcc: nnfolder:sent-usenet
X-Random-Quote: When a noble life has prepared old age, it is not 	decline that it reveals, but the first days of immortality. -- 	Germaine De Stael
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (windows-nt)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Dave Korn wrote:

>> Perhaps this can be "fixed" for any non-x86 Cygwin port?
>
>   The very concept of a non-x86 Cygwin port is meaningless nonsense.  You
> need to do a bit more homework.  I suggest you start by reading the first
> sentence on the first page at http://cygwin.com/.

Doesn't Windows Server 2003 run on Intel's Itanium processor?
Technically, that's a non-x86 Windows platform.
--
Fran


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/