X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-YMail-OSG: 6PFRi2oVM1ntGIzqEH84n5Pi5oFM3yfgTUjXmFQ_Ee33JddwrFBl3eI0M87J3iUlT_3X2DX.SN8yjiwiFSOuZXhVNonAJP7S9VMug52CPrUX6OxlMnwY28OSaS.eMTs- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <4899F174.1020000@sbcglobal.net> Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:46:12 +0000 From: Greg Chicares User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin 1.5.25 : Very slow command References: <4899EC23 DOT 8030605 AT nc DOT rr DOT com> In-Reply-To: <4899EC23.8030605@nc.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 2008-08-06 18:23Z, Burt Silverman wrote: > Just confirming Bruno DeLoroux observation that cygwin starts very very > slowly on some Windows XP installations. And "ls" is fairly slow. My > Desktop PC is generally faster than my laptop, but the situation is > reversed with regards to these cygwin activities; startup is painful on > the Desktop. Did you notice Dave Korn's reply posted 23 minutes after that original article? You might get specific suggestions tailored to your situation if you followed the procedure here: > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html It might be BLODA: http://cygwin.com/faq/faq.using.html#faq.using.bloda -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/