X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:32:55 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Problems with cygwin bash shell under NT Emacs
Message-ID: <20080714203254.GB22253@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <od52ltz3 DOT fsf AT gmail DOT com> <g5ec5t$n90$2 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <mykku57j DOT fsf AT gmail DOT com> <g5g2u7$6ht$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <g5g2u7$6ht$1@ger.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:38:42PM -0500, Ren? Berber wrote:
> But the FAQ seems to endorse NTemacs:
>
> http://cygwin.com/faq/faq-nochunks.html#faq.using.ntemacs

That isn't really endorsing.  It is just mentioned because it really is
a FAQ.  The FAQ entry ends with:

  Note that all of this ``just works'' if you use the Cygwin port of Emacs
  from Cygwin Setup.

Which brings us right back around to your original observation that
Cygwin has two flavors of emacs which work fine.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/