X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:20:43 -0400 From: "Mark J. Reed" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Bash startup problems on Windows 2008 server In-Reply-To: <20080625131258.GQ20180@calimero.vinschen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <87fxr13eam DOT fsf AT dod DOT no> <20080625131258 DOT GQ20180 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 47d5182aaa48e311 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com I know this is a lame suggestion, but I figure it can't hurt to throw it out there anyway: Does explicitly running setup.exe as Administrator make any difference here? I wouldn't expect it to matter on Vista, but perhaps Server '08, in the name of heightened security for servers, doesn't do the automatic privilege escalation for setup programs? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/