X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4860DCE6.20902@x-ray.at> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:39:18 +0200 From: Reini Urban Reply-To: "[ML] CygWin-Apps" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de-AT; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080313 SeaMonkey/1.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 Followup-To: "[ML],CygWin-Apps", CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: setup.exe needs package name selection filter References: <485AFB14 DOT 9090400 AT gmail DOT com> <20080620095103 DOT 3892 AT blackhawk> <20080620005700 DOT GB26573 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <485B02D9 DOT 8050806 AT gmail DOT com> <000501c8d2c7$68afb690$2708a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <485BA49A DOT 7090109 AT byu DOT net> <485BDF91 DOT 4050006 AT cygwin DOT com> <20080620195403 DOT GA31976 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4860D2C5 DOT 80700 AT x-ray DOT at> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Hugh Sasse schrieb: > On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Reini Urban wrote: > >> Hugh Sasse schrieb: >>> On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, Christopher Faylor wrote: > [...] >>> set? Were I in this position, I'd rather not have to trawl the mail >>> archives. That's the only mechanism suggested at >>> . > [...] >>> Would you accept patches to the contrib page that suggested the use >>> of the existing bugzilla as a resource? If so, then I'd like to add a table >>> of contents and re-order things a bit as well. >>> >>>> is going to change that or convince a small team of busy developers to >>>> do your bidding. >> We already have the setup bugzilla in operation. >> I am responsible for incoming tickets, most of them are spam, and trigger the >> developers if there's some update. >> >> It's additional work and in most of the cases not needed, but in some cases it >> might be useful. > > So would you prefer that I NOT suggest a patch to > . > to draw people's attention to the existing Bugzilla? The bugzilla is just an internal tool for the developers. We don't need additional attention there. The proper proposal and discussion is via the cygwin-apps@ list. Anecdote: perl5 and postgresql development still works only via discussion and patches to the mailinglists. There's no tracker at all. > Else, if you'd like a patch, to whom should I send it? As explained in the contrib guideline. To cygwin-apps@ of course. >> The current -p patch is at >> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6688 >> >> The name selection filter suggestion not yet. >> >> And it would be good if the setup.exe suggestion/reports would be posted to >> the right list, which is cygwin-apps, not cygwin! > > I could try and work something in to a patch for contrib.html > about that, if it is desired. > >> I rather tend to ignore it here. Followup set to -apps -- Reini Urban http://phpwiki.org/ http://murbreak.at/ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/