X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <48442EDB.11A94F8@dessent.net> Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 10:33:15 -0700 From: Brian Dessent X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Korn CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: rebase not compilable References: <6910a60806020741t7ff86d8bgbb7866e62acf1c09 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <484411AA DOT AF8A9011 AT dessent DOT net> <026f01c8c4d3$a4309510$2708a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Dave Korn wrote: > There are only 1024 possible image bases to choose from, and any DLL >= > 256kB in size will span several of them. Collisions are an inevitability, > no? I think we'll probably still have a need for rebase until the whole > world goes 64bit and we've got room for a few more hash buckets[*]. If the hash function is poor then don't you think it would make more sense to try to improve it to avoid collisions than to perpetuate this backwater hack of having to rebaseall over and over? Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/