X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <48250F36.4030403@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 22:57:58 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080421 Thunderbird/2.0.0.14 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: pkg-config-0.23a-1 References: <482450C2 DOT 2090409 AT lmco DOT com> In-Reply-To: <482450C2.2090409@lmco.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Damon Register wrote: > name AT address wrote: Please do not feed the harvesters. Do not quote email addresses in replies. >> The pkg-config program is used to retrieve information about installed >> libraries in the system, including the CFLAGS, LDFLAGS, and other >> information necessary to compile and link against one or more libraries. >> >> post 0.23 release: > is this the one called 0.23a-1 in the subject? These are official changes to upstream pkg-config's repository, after the 0.23 release. >> pkg-config 0.23 > this is just plain 0.23? yes. > Has anyone successfully used 0.23a-1? I just updated my Cygwin > installation this morning and I see the pkg-config version I got is > this new 0.23a-1. I have the PKG_CONFIG_PATH set and echo shows it > > $ echo $PKG_CONFIG_PATH > /usr/X11R6/lib/pkgconfig:/c/cygwin/lib/pkgconfig This should probably be /usr/X11R6/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/lib/pkgconfig (if you have C:/cygwin mounted as /, and C:/cygwin/lib mounted as /usr/lib (which is the normal configuration). > When I try to do a simple test, pkg-config segfaults confirmed. I'll look into it, and thanks for the report. pkg-config passed all of its built-in testsuite, but it appears there is some missing "coverage" in those tests! -- Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/