X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <3ee066b40804292128l70e7a2b2w514fca0f6f92dba3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:58:40 +0530 From: "antony baxter" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: inetutils 1.5 / ftpd problem: 426 Data connection: No buffer space available. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Charles, > Unless somebody squawks loudly and soon, I'm going to release inetutils-1.5-4 using 4k buffers for ftpd send_data(). Squawk! Unfortunately, with XP SP2, Cygwin 1.5 as the server machine, I get pretty much the same symptoms with each of the above ftpds serving up a 350mb file: 1. In all cases, the ftpd process' memory usage increases to ~350mb, 2. As the buffer value decreases, the process' cpu usage increases (ftpd-1k.exe used about 75% of the cpu vs. about 10% for ftpd-8k.exe), 3. Performance jumped around (ftpd-1k transferred the file in 90seconds, ftpd-4k in 166 seconds, ftp-8k in 114 seconds on a wired network) Sorry! Ant. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/