X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 14:47:40 +1200
From: Danny Smith <dannysmith AT clear DOT net DOT nz>
Subject: RE: [ mingw-Patches-1789093 ] Modernize mingw10.dll build procedure
In-reply-to: <48128DBE.6000303@users.sourceforge.net>
To: "'Charles Wilson'" <cwilso11 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
Cc: mingw-users AT lists DOT sourceforge DOT net,
   "'Cygwin Mailing List'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-id: <000001c8a747$e5db4bd0$ef4861cb@THOMAS>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6838
Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id m3Q2nIKS008097

> From: Charles Wilson
> Sent: Saturday, 26 April 2008 2:05 p.m.
> 
> SourceForge.net wrote:
> > Patches item #1789093, was opened at 2007-09-06 14:33
> > 
> > Comment By: Danny Smith (dannysmith)
> > Date: 2008-04-25 17:42
> > 
> > Ping!
> 
> Danny, you'd do better to ping the main mingw [and cygwin] lists.
> 
> Comments on sf bugs go to the originator (me -- and I can't 
> do anything 
> about it, or I already would have) and to the assignee (e.g. no-one).

I would have thought that most active developers were suscribed to the mingw-notify lists:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-notify
for bugs and patches.

Can we have a default assignee for build machinery bugs/patches?

> 
> I've copied this message to both lists.
> 

Thanks for the cover.
Danny

> Original bug report with patch:
> > As discussed in this thread:
> > 
> > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.mingw.user/23721
> > 
> > The current build procedure for mingw10.dll produces a DLL 
> with duplicate .reloc sections.  According to 
> > 
> > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.mingw.user/23739
> > 
> > the patch posted here (and attached to this tracker):
> > 
> > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.mingw.user/23737
> > 
> > corrects this problem.
> 
> 
> --
> Chuck
> 


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/