X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <20080322214247.61705.qmail@web3313.mail.ogk.yahoo.co.jp>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 06:42:47 +0900 (JST)
From: Tatsuro MATSUOKA <tmacchant2 AT yahoo DOT co DOT jp>
Reply-To: matsuoka AT nuce DOT nagoya-u DOT ac DOT jp
Subject: Re: Cygwin problems under Vista
To: matsuoka AT nuce DOT nagoya-u DOT ac DOT jp, Vinod Gupta <vinod AT Princeton DOT EDU>,
   cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To: <20080322185434.43635.qmail@web3304.mail.ogk.yahoo.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Hello

I'll forward the message from Vinod.
I cannot reply him any longer since I am mere a user.

My opinion is that if the Cygwin-X  no longer works well on the Vista, at least it should be stated on
the web.

Regards

Tatsuro 

--- Vinod Gupta wrote:
As I said in my original posting, lots of people have reported Cygwin-X
problems under Vista, not XP. What surprises me is why Cygwin is
insisting on bundling a broken and unmaintained package when a working
one is available.

Regards,

--------------------------------------
Easy + Joy + Powerful = Yahoo! Bookmarks x Toolbar
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/toolbar/

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/