X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
From: "David Billinghurst" <dbcygwin AT gmail DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <b609cb3b0803172022j53ddd72bt366e213b3cb7dbc3 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Subject: RE: gmp/mpfr status
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:35:24 +1100
Message-ID: <001801c888ec$2aaa6a90$0301a8c0@cal.riotinto.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <b609cb3b0803172022j53ddd72bt366e213b3cb7dbc3@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

> From: NightStrike
> 
> Is there an approximate timeline for when the gmp and mpfr packages
> will be upgraded to the minimum required for compiling gcc?  Really, I
> guess it's just mpfr that has to be upgraded to 2.3.0., but I think
> mpfr 2.3.0 requires gmp 4.2.2.
> 

I have working packages of gmp-4.2.2 and mpfr-2.3.1.  I will try and upload
them this weekend.

	David


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/