X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Dave Korn" To: References: <5E25AF06EFB9EA4A87C19BC98F5C87531641A1 AT core-email DOT int DOT ascribe DOT com> <47AB31C7 DOT 3040909 AT cyconix DOT com> <47AB3B0B DOT 9060902 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <47AB4520 DOT 2050305 AT cyconix DOT com> Subject: RE: Incomplete environ when running MinGW apps? Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 18:04:08 -0000 Message-ID: <04d801c869b3$d97c8ce0$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <47AB4520.2050305@cyconix.com> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 07 February 2008 17:51, Paul Leder wrote: > Hmm. I think you're right; I need to give up looking for a robust way to > do this. I think I'll: > > if( > (system(uname) looks sane) && > (system(cygpath -m /bin/sh) returns success)) > use CreateProcess with /bin/sh path returned by cygpath; > else > use CreateProcess with cmd.exe /c > > And I'll need to test it when run from a DOS box, with Cygwin's bin in > the path. Out of curiosity, what's the problem with just using system("...") always? cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/