Message-ID: <47A92CBD.7090008@cygwin.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 22:42:53 -0500
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070505 Remi/2.0.0.0-3.fc4.remi Thunderbird/2.0.0.0 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Updated: clisp-2.44-1 for cygwin
References: <47A799BA DOT 40801 AT x-ray DOT at> <47A923D0 DOT 6000506 AT aim DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <47A923D0.6000506@aim.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Mark Harig wrote:
> Reini Urban wrote:
>> I've released the new upstream clisp-2.44 plus subpackages -clx, -gtk2 
>> and -gdi for cygwin.
>>
> Thank you for updating clisp to the latest version.  I am seeing a 
> reproducible
> error when I attempt to use it.  Error code 53 is returned when the '-K 
> full'
> option is supplied to clisp:
> 
>      $ /usr/bin/clisp -norc -q -K full || echo $?
>      53
> 
>      $ cygcheck -c cygwin clisp ffcall
>      Cygwin Package Information
>      Package              Version        Status
>      clisp                2.44-1         OK
>      cygwin               1.5.25-7       OK
>      ffcall               1.10-1         OK
> 
> 
> I attempted to eliminate this problem by reverting to the previous
> version of clisp, 2.43-2, but the same error number was returned.
> 
> No such error is returned for the base set of modules for either version
> 2.43-2 or 2.44-1:
> 
>      $ /usr/bin/clisp -q -norc -K base || echo $?
>      [1]>_
> 
> Please let me know if there is some more environmental information that
> I can provide to help resolve this problem.

Sounds like it could be a missing dependency problem.  Does 'cygcheck clisp'
report any missing DLLs?

-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/