X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:21:28 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: sftp removing writable bit Message-ID: <20070918152128.GB27067@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <46E7FB17 DOT 3030904 AT scranton DOT edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 06:29:27PM -0500, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > Andrew DeFaria wrote: >> IOW what's the advantage of an sftp client over just plain scp? > > Directory listings. Unless I miss something, it's hard to scp a file when > you don't already know its path. PLEASE. This thread has lasted long enough that all salient points have been made. We need to move on now. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/