X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <31b7d2790707131317r48a2b4ear1c917902f88aa68f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:17:04 -0500 From: "DePriest, Jason R." To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Non-trusted domain user causes mkpasswd and mkgroup to fail In-Reply-To: <70952A932255A2489522275A628B97C304C130C5@xmb-sjc-233.amer.cisco.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <015b01c7c567$6f21fbf0$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <70952A932255A2489522275A628B97C304C130C5 AT xmb-sjc-233 DOT amer DOT cisco DOT com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 7/13/07, Matt Seitz (matseitz) wrote: > From: Dave Korn > > > > Let me repeat myself: > > > > >> If you aren't > > >> logged into the domain > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > Logging into the local machine and logging into the domain > > are two different > > things. When you are not logged in to the domain, it would > > be very very wrong > > for the domain controller to send you any information about > > the domain.[*] > > Sorry, I guess I'm still not being clear. When I did "runas /netonly > /user:machine\user" followed by "mkpasswd -d machine -u user", I was > trying to create a "passwd" entry for a user account that was local to > the server named "machine". In other words, I was trying to access > information about the "machine\user" local user account. I was not > trying to access information about a domain user account. > > Perhaps I'm confusing things by using the example name "user" in both > cases. Let me try restating it: > > "runas /netonly /user:domain1\userA" followed by "mkpasswd -d domain1 -u > userA": works > "runas /netonly /user:machine2\userB" followed by "mkpasswd -d machine2 > -u userB": fails > > -- > Matt Seitz > Manager, File System Virtualization > Cisco Systems, Inc. > .:|:.:|:. > If the server is stand alone, wouldn't mkpasswd -l be more appropriate than mkpasswd -d? -Jason -- NOTICE: This email is being sent in clear-text across the public Internet. Therefore, any attempts to include unenforceable legalese restrictions are ridiculous and pointless. If you can read this, consider yourself authorized (whether I like it or not). -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/