X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <468AA95E.7030905@bonhard.uklinux.net> Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 20:54:06 +0100 From: fergus User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cygwin ML CC: Igor Peshansky , fergus Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Setup.exe updated to version 2.573.2.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > I asked was whether you could make a stock Cygwin system > on *your* machine and reproduce the issue, just to figure > out if this is an issue in setup because of the non-default > Cygwin location, or there are other things different about > your system. I did this. I built a brand new Cygwin located conventionally at c:\Cygwin, and then un-mounted it. I used both old setup.exe (2.510.2.2) and new setup.exe (2.573.2.2), one after the other, and both pointing at c:\Cygwin. Both successfully remounted the system and also both noticed correctly that no update was required. I then built a new system neither at \ nor c:\Cygwin, actually at c:\Test. I un-mounted it. I used old setup, then new setup, both pointing at c:\Test. Old setup noticed that no update was required. However, new setup again failed to see this, and attempted a complete download. It seems to me that it is not the location at the root that confuses new setup, but any location that is not at \Cygwin. Fergus -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/