X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Dave Korn" To: References: <1634 DOT 172 DOT 31 DOT 7 DOT 50 DOT 1175774951 DOT squirrel AT mail DOT tiet DOT ac DOT in> <02ec01c7777b$66fe8ef0$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <813e5f920704062130n18018f6dr789e03ca83eb61a4 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> Subject: RE: dos.h support Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 11:14:52 +0100 Message-ID: <047a01c778fd$969fe9f0$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <813e5f920704062130n18018f6dr789e03ca83eb61a4@mail.gmail.com> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 07 April 2007 05:30, Hugh McMaster wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On 05/04/07, Dave Korn wrote: >> Make sure you've got it installed, then add -mno-cygwin to your compiler >> flags, then please send any followup questions to a mingw mailing list, not >> here, because you aren't really using cygwin any more, you're compiling a >> mingw program, and you won't be able to get as good advice here as you >> would there. > > What was the final decision over the use of -mno-cygwin flags? I > thought it was being removed, but couldn't find a message stating > that. That's still the long term plan, but I wasn't planning to rush out a new 3.4 release just to remove it; unless there's some massive clamour, I thought we'd look at it when we start moving to gcc-4. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/