X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <45FFCFA0.10204@cygwin.com> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 08:12:16 -0400 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061221 Fedora/1.5.0.9-1.fc4.remi Thunderbird/1.5.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygcheck output References: <195b3f1f0703200008k1de0352bp1f75d91f642e4eec AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> In-Reply-To: <195b3f1f0703200008k1de0352bp1f75d91f642e4eec@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Wynfield Henman wrote: > I just wanted a clarification of the meaning that's not quite clear to > me in the > output that I got from cygcheck. > > For example the next two lines. It says "Empty package atk-runtime" , > but below it shows atk-runtime 1.10.3-1 as OK. The difference > between "Empty" and "OK" is what I am concerned about. > > Empty package atk-runtime > atk-runtime 1.10.3-1 OK -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/